×

Warning message

  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.
  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.

FWSM question

Unanswered Question
May 6th, 2003
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

Hi!


Is MSFC required if CatOS is run on the Supervisor?


According to docs FWSM runs its own routing and from FWSM point of view

MSFC is just an external router. Right? So, can external router be used instead

of MSFC?


Oleg Tipisov,

REDCENTER,

Moscow


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Prashanth Krishnappa Tue, 05/06/2003 - 04:05
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,

MSFC is not mandatory but preferable due to better performance due to MLS/CEF compared to an external router

ovt@redcenter.ru Tue, 05/06/2003 - 23:11
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

Just to understand this better: Is that correct that SVI (FWSM-to-MSFC-or-other-router VLAN) is needed to only exchange routing updates between MSFC and

FWSM and FWSM forwarding decisions are completely independent of MSFC?


The SVI VLAN should be the only VLAN common to both FWSM and MSFC

unless CatOS 7.6 is used that supports multiple SVIs. Correct?


Regards,

Oleg Tipisov,

REDCENTER



Actions

This Discussion