×

Warning message

  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.
  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.

DLSw remote peer configuration order

Unanswered Question

I input the following configuration on a CPE router:


dlsw local-peer peer-id <address>

dlsw timer explorer-wait-time 100

dlsw load-balance circuit-count

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address1> cost 1 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address2> cost 1 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address3> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address4> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address5> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address6> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address7> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address8> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw bridge-group 9


In a normal operation all circuits are stablished over remote dlsw routers <address1> and <address2> in a load balance way.


But I note the following behavior if the <address1> router fail, when I list the configuration, I see:


dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address2> cost 1 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address3> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address4> cost 2 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address5> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address6> circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address7> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address8> cost 4 circuit-weight 10

dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp <address1> cost 1 circuit-weight 10


The router send the failed peer to the last position on configuration list.


This is correct or is a bug ?


Thank's in advance.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
rsissons Mon, 09/01/2003 - 19:30
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

It is normal. It will be listed last as DLSW will periodically try to bring it up.

Actions

This Discussion