See the attachment please
Requirements:
1.Using only physical interfaces configure a Frame Relay hub-and-spoke network between RTA and RTB and RTC, RTB as the hub.
2.Traffic from RTA destined for RTC should transit RTB, and vice versa.
3.Use only the DLCIs specified in the diagram.
4.Do not use any Dynamic layer 3 to layer 2 mappings over these frame Relay connections.
5.Do not send any redundant broadcast traffic from the spokes to the hub.
RTB (Hub):
interface Serial0/0
ip address 3.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 200 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 300 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
RTA (Spoke):
interface Serial0/0
ip address 3.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.2 22 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22
no frame-relay inverse-arp
RTC (Spoke):
interface Serial1/0
ip address 3.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.2 33 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33
no frame-relay inverse-arp
My queries:
A- Does he use these two statements because (frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22 and frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33 ) of requirement number 2 ?
B- Doesn’t he use keyword “broadcast” in these two statements (frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22 and frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33) because of requirement 5?
C- Does that mean if requirement 5 is not there we should have used “broadcast“ keyword ?
D- Does not that contradict with what Cisco syas: “The broadcast keyword is commonly used with the frame relay map command” ?
E- By using these two statements (frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.3 22 and frame-relay map ip 3.1.1.1 33) doesn’t my network become full mesh? but if you look to the diagram it is partial mesh ?
