ARP Timer vs CAM Timer

Unanswered Question
jarathbu Tue, 02/28/2006 - 18:07
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more


I suspect that it may have roots back to the integration of companies in the earlier acquisitions (i.e. Calpana, etc.). Both the timers are adjustable and if you're having issues with Unicast Flooding you should adjust them to mitigate excessive flooding.




Richard Burts Tue, 02/28/2006 - 19:00
User Badges:
  • Super Silver, 17500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

I believe that James has made a good suggestion when he points at the acquisitions Cisco has made.

In addition I believe that one factor is the ARP times comes out of IOS and reflects the outlook of layer 3 routing. In particular since the IOS must actively acquire the content of ARP table (actively sending ARP request to learn the MAC address, timing entries out of the table, and immediately sending another ARP request for the entries timed out) it was more efficient for the router to have a relatively long ARP timer.

The CAM comes out of a layer 2 switching orientation. The switch does not actively acquire content of the CAM (does not send out requests) but listens to incoming traffic to build the CAM. So it made sense to have a short timer on the CAM.




This Discussion