×

Warning message

  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.
  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.
pciaccio Wed, 09/27/2006 - 04:00
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

Yes.. However it is a waste of addresses having a subnet other then /32. You can have any mask on a loopback that you want..Please rate...

Richard Burts Wed, 09/27/2006 - 05:13
User Badges:
  • Super Silver, 17500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

I agree with Phil that you can put any valid subnet mask on a loopback interface. Whether it is a waste of addresses depends on what you are attempting to accomplish. For example I have configured routers to function as dial access servers and for this I need a pool of addresses. I wish for my routing protocol to advertise the pool of addresses as a subnet rather than as individual /32s. So I configured the address of the subnet with appropriate subnet mask on a loopback interface and have the routing protocol advertise that. It is useful and not a waste.


HTH


Rick

gpulos Wed, 09/27/2006 - 05:45
User Badges:
  • Blue, 1500 points or more

i agree with rburts here.


using vlsm or classful subnet masks, other than all \32, allows you the ability to perform dynamic routing functions for the 'group' of loopbacks vs. static routing for each of them.


in some cases, the routing of loopbacks may be required and entering in many individual \32 routes may not be optimal or easily accomplished.


Actions

This Discussion