IPv6 Etherchannel : Workaround

Document

Jun 4, 2012 5:13 AM
Jun 4th, 2012

1. Introduction

IPv6 Etherchannel is not yet supported on Cisco IOS. Through this document we configure Layer 3 etherchannel between two switches, the two end points acts as GRE tunnel source and destination. IPv6 traffic is sent over GRE tunnel and hence using the bandwidth of Etherchannel.

2. Prerequisite

  1. Understanding and Configuring Layer 3 Etherchannel
  2. IPv6 Routing Protocols

3. Summary

Router R1 and Switch SW1 are forming OSPFv3 peering. Router R1 is advertising its loopback prefixes to SW1 through IPv6 OSPF routing protocol. Further SW1 and SW2 partipate in IPv6 RIP routing protocol over the GRE tunnel. The tunnel end points are the IPv4 interface of the Port-Channel (PO13). On SW1, IPv6 mutual redistribution is performed between OSPFv3 and RIPng.

The idea is to pass IPv6 traffic through Layer 3 Etherchannel.

Hardware Incorporated

Switch: Cisco C3750G Switch running IOS Version 12.2(44)SE5 (Advance IP Services)

Router: Cisco C3845 series router running IOS Version 12.4(15)T14 (Advance IP Services)

4. Topology Diagram

New Topology Diagram.bmp

5. Configuration

SW 1SW 2

Interface Tunnel13

  no ip address

  ipv6 address 2012:10::1/64

  ipv6 rip RIPING enable

  tunnel source 192.168.10.1

  tunnel destination 192.168.10.2

Interface Port-channel13

  no switchport

  ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

Interface Tunnel13

  no ip address

  ipv6 address 2012:10::3/64

  ipv6 rip RIPING enable

  tunnel source 192.168.10.2

  tunnel destination 192.168.10.1

Interface Port-channel13

  no switchport

  ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0

For Complete Configurations, please see attached files.

6. Verification

On R1

show ipv6 route

R1-show ipv6 route.bmp

On SW2

ping ipv6 <destination> source <>

SW2 - Ping.bmp

7. References

IPv6 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Configuring Layer 3 Etherchannel

Average Rating: 0 (0 ratings)

Comments

Laurent Aubert Mon, 06/04/2012 - 17:55

As the layer 2 and 3 headers don't change, I'm not expecting a fair load-sharing over the links member of the bundle. L3 load-balancing may be a better approach here.

My 2 cts

Laurent.

Actions

Login or Register to take actions

This Document

Posted June 4, 2012 at 5:13 AM
Stats:
Comments:1 Avg. Rating:0
Views:2815 Contributors:1
Shares:0

Related Content

Documents Leaderboard