Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Apply service policy via Radius?

Hi,

Have DSL users terminating on LNS(7204) via Eth, with radius auth - Trying to apply the following service policy(Configured on LNS) upon successful auth:

policy-map JLF-2MB-ADSL
class class-default
    shape average 1850000

Using the following av-pair:

ip:sub-qos-policy-out=JLF-2MB-ADSL

But the user is unable to auth, and I am seeing the following with debug l2x

Mar  4 12:48:11.953 AEST: Vi16 AAA/PER-USER: Set output QoS policy to JLF-2MB-ADSL
Mar  4 12:48:11.953 AEST: Vi16 AAA/PERUSER/ROUTE: vrf name for vaccess: JLF
Mar  4 12:48:11.953 AEST: Vi16 AAA/PERUSER/ROUTE: route string: IP route vrf JLF 192.168.6.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0

Mar  4 12:48:11.953 AEST: Vi16 AAA/PERUSER/ROUTE: vrf name for vaccess: JLF
Mar  4 12:48:11.953 AEST: Vi16 AAA/PERUSER/ROUTE: route string: IP route vrf JLF 192.168.101.229 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0

Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204: 
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204: Shutting down session
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:   Result Code
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:     Call disconnected, refer to error msg (2)
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:   Error Code
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:     Vendor specific (6)
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:   Vendor Error
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:     Admin shut (3)
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:   Optional Message
Mar  4 12:48:11.957 AEST: L2TP 000FE:01C87:0000A204:     "admin-reset/VPDN Admin Disconnect"

Removing the ip:sub-qos-policy-out=JLF-2MB-ADSL from radius profile for the user, they are able to connect.

Thanks in advance.

512
Views
0
Helpful
0
Replies