01-25-2008 01:35 AM
01-25-2008 02:29 AM
Why don't you use automatic config synch ??
With config synch the name will obviously be the same.
So, if you do manual synch currently, and use different name (could be possible I think), you will never be able to implement auto synch.
Therefore, I don't see why you would want to do this.
Gilles.
01-25-2008 02:29 AM
Why don't you use automatic config synch ??
With config synch the name will obviously be the same.
So, if you do manual synch currently, and use different name (could be possible I think), you will never be able to implement auto synch.
Therefore, I don't see why you would want to do this.
Gilles.
01-25-2008 02:41 AM
It was purely for convenience. I don't actually need to do it. I wanted to specify in the context name whether is was Active or Standdby by design. I'll be using autosynch once all physical connections are up.
Thanks again :)
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide