Thanks a lot for your reply, and please accept my excuse because I'm not a network guy
I have asked the same question to our load balancer administrator and as understood from him "It is not possible to use stickiness method with the leastconn predictor". So please if you have any document or reference to show it to him.
Also do you think the load distribution will be enhanced if we used the least conn predictor?
However, that does not mean you will have better loadbalancing results since eventually you want stickyness so, if one person opens many more connections that the other ones, you will see more hits on one server.
I would suggest to give it a try.
Try leastconn + stickyness or roundrobin + stickyness...
There is no perfect combination that would work for all.
You have to try all possible combinations and see which one is best for you.
Topology & Design:
Two ACI fabrics
Stretching VLANs using OTV
Both fabrics are advertising BD subnets into same routing domain
Some BDs(or say VLANs) are stretched, but some are not.
Endpoints can move betwee...
VMware Trunk Port Group is supported from ACI version 2.1
VMM integration must be configured properly
ASA device package must be uploaded to APIC
ASAv version must be compatible with ACI and device package version
Topology &Design:Traffic flow within same fabric:Endpoint moves to Fabric-2Bounce Entry Times OutTraffic Black-holedSummarySolutionAppendix:
In the Previous articles of ACI Automation, we are using Postman/Newman a...