10-31-2003 10:08 AM
Current setup is x2 CSS11051 which works in an active:active configuration (one customer busines are on each but with mutual failover over multiple vlans).
Requirement is to add x2 SCA2's 11000 for SSL offloading. From the documentation I think that the the best configuration will be one-armed transparent proxy. I need to confirm a couple a couple of things:
- that it is possible to load balance to the SCA devices (and allow for the failure of one SCA and with no discernable disruption to service).
- is it okay to post the config so someone to scan through to check the setup for i/ load balancing to the SCA and then ii/ subsequent load balancing to the web servers.
- why separate vlans are needed for each SCA ?
A colleaque of mine is favouring having an SCA aligned to a CSS and in the event of an SCA failure that the second CSS senses this and fails over. Not sure if this is possible, I personally favour one-armed transparent approach.
Any recommendations would be great, I just cant see resiliant CSS's and SCA's examples documented anywhere.
11-06-2003 12:51 PM
The document below shows a sample configuration for one-armed proxy setup using a CSS and SCA.
This is the most scalable configuration, and is easy to troubleshoot.
You will find documents on load balancing at the following url.
11-07-2003 12:41 AM
SEe figure B6 in the example above.
This is an example with multiple SCA.
I confirmed you need separate vlan for this setup to work - however I can't find the explanation anymore.
You can post your configs if you want, I'll review them.
Gilles.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide