Due to the following route statements on your CSS the servers response traffic is getting sent to IP/device 188.8.131.52.
ip route 184.108.40.206 255.255.255.255 220.127.116.11 1
ip route 18.104.22.168 255.255.255.255 22.214.171.124 1
Are the servers suppose to send their traffic to the 126.96.36.199 IP address? Or are they setup to use the 188.8.131.52 IP address as their gateway? If so, then the additional route statements should not be needed.
Also, have you verified the services have passed their keepalive check? Even though you have a URI of "/" and a keepalive port of "9080" on the services there is no keepalive type specified in the service configuration. The CSS should have defaulted to using ICMP keepaive check for the services.
VMware Trunk Port Group is supported from ACI version 2.1
VMM integration must be configured properly
ASA device package must be uploaded to APIC
ASAv version must be compatible with ACI and device package version
In the Previous articles of ACI Automation, we are using Postman/Newman as the Rest API tool to automate the ACI Configuration.
In this article I’m going to discuss on usin...
One of the first steps in building your ACI Fabric is to go through Fabric Discovery. While Fabric Discovery is usually a straightforward process, there are various issues that may prevent you from discovering an ACI switch. This article wil...