12-11-2002 09:04 AM
I'm running up against a brick wall trying to have the VIP service requests for some web servers on port 80, but balance it across a number of servers - all of which are running on another port. Is this actually possible?
Ben
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-11-2002 12:12 PM
Yes, you can "port nat".
Simply have the content rule confgured for port 80, and have the services configured for the different ports.
12-11-2002 12:12 PM
Yes, you can "port nat".
Simply have the content rule confgured for port 80, and have the services configured for the different ports.
12-12-2002 04:10 AM
Thanks for the reply - I thought I'd tried that but with the following config requests to the VIP on port 80 return a page saying 'Invalid Host Specified: The request did not specify a valid virutal host".
!************************** SERVICE **************************
service Server1
ip address X.X.X.1
port 7654
protocol tcp
active
service Server2
ip address X.X.X.2
port 7654
protocol tcp
active
!*************************** OWNER ***************************
owner ben
content balanced_servers
add service Server1
add service Server2
vip address X.X.X.10
port 80
protocol tcp
active
!*************************** GROUP ***************************
group balanced_servers_reply
vip address X.X.X.10
add destination service Server1
add destination service Server2
active
I'm beginning to suspect that the problem may be with the settings of the group.
Ben
12-13-2002 01:23 AM
Sorry - just noticed that I didn't mention we're running a 'one armed' config (CSS attached by single connection to the same switch as the servers being balanced against).
12-17-2002 03:40 AM
Problem solved - the CSS was playing ball all along - it was a problem with the servers being balanced against.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide