12-11-2002 09:04 AM
I'm running up against a brick wall trying to have the VIP service requests for some web servers on port 80, but balance it across a number of servers - all of which are running on another port. Is this actually possible?
Ben
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-11-2002 12:12 PM
Yes, you can "port nat".
Simply have the content rule confgured for port 80, and have the services configured for the different ports.
12-11-2002 12:12 PM
Yes, you can "port nat".
Simply have the content rule confgured for port 80, and have the services configured for the different ports.
12-12-2002 04:10 AM
Thanks for the reply - I thought I'd tried that but with the following config requests to the VIP on port 80 return a page saying 'Invalid Host Specified: The request did not specify a valid virutal host".
!************************** SERVICE **************************
service Server1
ip address X.X.X.1
port 7654
protocol tcp
active
service Server2
ip address X.X.X.2
port 7654
protocol tcp
active
!*************************** OWNER ***************************
owner ben
content balanced_servers
add service Server1
add service Server2
vip address X.X.X.10
port 80
protocol tcp
active
!*************************** GROUP ***************************
group balanced_servers_reply
vip address X.X.X.10
add destination service Server1
add destination service Server2
active
I'm beginning to suspect that the problem may be with the settings of the group.
Ben
12-13-2002 01:23 AM
Sorry - just noticed that I didn't mention we're running a 'one armed' config (CSS attached by single connection to the same switch as the servers being balanced against).
12-17-2002 03:40 AM
Problem solved - the CSS was playing ball all along - it was a problem with the servers being balanced against.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: