Cisco says use "destination service" under the source group to change the default NAT behaviour of the CSS, because the servers' default gateways are set to the router IP address and the source IP address of the load balanced request is not on the local subnet. I understand this way you avoid the packets reaching the router directly when they head back to the client, bypassing the CSS.
Now the question I got here is that, what if I set the Servers' default gateway to the CSS rather than the Router. This way you are actually forcing the packets destined for remote networks to go through the CSS DG.. Should I need the source group anyway here. I think I don?t. Someone please clarify. Much appreciated?
Topology & Design:
Two ACI fabrics
Stretching VLANs using OTV
Both fabrics are advertising BD subnets into same routing domain
Some BDs(or say VLANs) are stretched, but some are not.
Endpoints can move betwee...
VMware Trunk Port Group is supported from ACI version 2.1
VMM integration must be configured properly
ASA device package must be uploaded to APIC
ASAv version must be compatible with ACI and device package version
Topology &Design:Traffic flow within same fabric:Endpoint moves to Fabric-2Bounce Entry Times OutTraffic Black-holedSummarySolutionAppendix:
In the Previous articles of ACI Automation, we are using Postman/Newman a...