If both servers are listening om port 80 & 443 then you can use a layer 3 rule and SRC Ip based stickiness to achieve this
ip address 192.168.100.2
ip address 192.168.100.3
vip address 192.168.1.6
add service server1
add service server2
The other option you have is to (If you want to use layer4 + rules) Configure the servers in both port 80 rule and port 443 rule in the same order and use "balance srcip". The balance srcip should hash the
client requests to the same server. In a steady state this works fine but if the servers go up/down then the hash is recalculated which may cause clients to end up at a different server...
Pardon my ignorance, but does this mean the CSS is now acting just as a L3 load balancer? So irrespective of which ports come in they get sent to server 1 or server 2 depending on which has the least connections?
I ask as I have a situation where the client originally specified WWW traffic should go to one of the four AV Webwashers. However, they have now asked that other traffic besides WWW traffic is incorporated and load balanced and I am unsure how to do this on the CSS. (Its not a product I have used much and most examples seem to indicate services must be used)
Topology & Design:
Two ACI fabrics
Stretching VLANs using OTV
Both fabrics are advertising BD subnets into same routing domain
Some BDs(or say VLANs) are stretched, but some are not.
Endpoints can move betwee...
VMware Trunk Port Group is supported from ACI version 2.1
VMM integration must be configured properly
ASA device package must be uploaded to APIC
ASAv version must be compatible with ACI and device package version
Topology &Design:Traffic flow within same fabric:Endpoint moves to Fabric-2Bounce Entry Times OutTraffic Black-holedSummarySolutionAppendix:
In the Previous articles of ACI Automation, we are using Postman/Newman a...