Apart from web servers for SAP (vlan 100), there will be some other servers too which are going to be connected to same 2970. Same way, Another LB will be used for SIEBEL servers but they are altogether physicall different CSSes connected to same PIX and same 2970 switches.
Please correct me if I am wrong:
1. Traffic coming for other servers will be simply forwarded by LoadBalancer, even if it is not matching vip defined in the content rule.
2. Default gateway for SAP servers will be Redundant Interface IP (server side), vip defined in the content rule also will be from the same subnet.
3. I will assign vip (which is from SAP subnet) under separate vlan which should be defined for connectivity between PIX and Loadbalancer.
4. Inline mode should be preferable over One-armed mode. If my first point is wrong then do I have to implement using one-armed mode only.
VMware Trunk Port Group is supported from ACI version 2.1
VMM integration must be configured properly
ASA device package must be uploaded to APIC
ASAv version must be compatible with ACI and device package version
In the Previous articles of ACI Automation, we are using Postman/Newman as the Rest API tool to automate the ACI Configuration.
In this article I’m going to discuss on usin...
One of the first steps in building your ACI Fabric is to go through Fabric Discovery. While Fabric Discovery is usually a straightforward process, there are various issues that may prevent you from discovering an ACI switch. This article wil...