I have a situation where we need a destination nat to happen on ACE for an outbound flow that is redirected into SSLM modules, then coming back to the ACE and forwarded outward. There is a requirement to keep the SSLM module redirection so will not be able to achieve the encryption for the outbound connection by using the ACE.
I have a conflict when trying to implement as the real destination VIP (10.11.12.158 443) is being matched on two âmatch-anyâ class-maps. One is needed to direct traffic to the destination VIP via the SSLMs, and the other class-map is required to âstatic natâ the destination address when the flow leaves the ACE.
Any suggestion how to achieve the destination natting in this case?
This document will provide screenshots to outline the steps to setup
TACACS+ configuration to ACI and also the configuration required on
Cisco ACS server. Please find the official Cisco guide for configuring
TACACS+ Authentication to ACI:
Is it supported or NOT supported? It's a frequently asked question.
Before APIC, release 2.3(1f), transit routing was not supported within a
single L3Out profile. In APIC, release 2.3(1f) and later, you can
configure transit routing with a single L3Out pr...
Cisco Documents are usually accurate, but when it came to the document
on Cisco APIC Signature-Based Transactions it was slightly off the mark.
This document is for those novices to API like me who cant seem to
figure out how to go about performing signat...