Is it not possible for the App1 client to target a VIP that will load balance across the serversm and the client for App2 to target the real IP? For App2 it does not need to go through the module at all no? Just straight through the Switc/router?
actually just passthrough in load balancer for application 2.
when client send traffic for application 2 with address https://10.10.192.100:1416 client actually access the virtual ip in load balancer for this scenario we using 2 server (each server have 2 application) but for the application 2 server have service guard ip (like virtual ip but from server side not in load balancer). the logicaly from client access vip in load balancer and by load balancer redirect to service guard ip but just for access port 1416.
This document will provide screenshots to outline the steps to setup
TACACS+ configuration to ACI and also the configuration required on
Cisco ACS server. Please find the official Cisco guide for configuring
TACACS+ Authentication to ACI:
Is it supported or NOT supported? It's a frequently asked question.
Before APIC, release 2.3(1f), transit routing was not supported within a
single L3Out profile. In APIC, release 2.3(1f) and later, you can
configure transit routing with a single L3Out pr...
Cisco Documents are usually accurate, but when it came to the document
on Cisco APIC Signature-Based Transactions it was slightly off the mark.
This document is for those novices to API like me who cant seem to
figure out how to go about performing signat...