cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
490
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

NTP Server behind CSS / Responses from outside don't get through

jxdemel
Level 1
Level 1

I have a CSS and behind it an NTP-Server (simulated for this posting by the ntpdate-command:

First, when I use ntpdate -q 128.130.2.7 (with the -q parameter a source-port >1024 is used) all wents fine, I get a response and the flow trace-ip shows:

JAN 20 10:12:15 1/1 1187 FLOWMGR-4: UDP in 192.168.7.73:35700->128.130.2.7:123

JAN 20 10:12:15 1/1 1188 FLOWMGR-4: UDP out 128.131.2.73:4724->128.130.2.7:123

JAN 20 10:12:15 1/1 1189 FLOWMGR-4: UDP in 128.130.2.7:123->128.131.2.73:4724

JAN 20 10:12:15 1/1 1190 FLOWMGR-4: UDP out 128.130.2.7:123->192.168.7.73:35700

But when I now use ntpdate 128.130.2.7 without the -q option, i.e. well known Source Port 123 is used, no response come through and the trace-ip shows:

JAN 20 10:13:20 1/1 1194 FLOWMGR-4: UDP in 192.168.7.73:123->128.130.2.7:123

JAN 20 10:13:20 1/1 1195 FLOWMGR-4: UDP out 128.131.2.73:123->128.130.2.7:123

JAN 20 10:13:20 1/1 1196 FLOWMGR-4: UDP in 128.130.2.7:123->128.131.2.73:123

JAN 20 10:13:21 1/1 1197 FLOWMGR-4: UDP in 128.130.2.7:123->128.131.2.73:123

JAN 20 10:13:22 1/1 1198 FLOWMGR-4: UDP in 128.130.2.7:123->128.131.2.73:123

JAN 20 10:13:23 1/1 1199 FLOWMGR-4: UDP in 128.130.2.7:123->128.131.2.73:123

i.e. 128.130.2.7 sends the response to the vip-address and the css receives it, but does not send it to the requesting server.

The relevant configuration parts are (currently ACL is disabled!):

!************************** CIRCUIT **************************

circuit VLAN602

ip address 128.131.2.101 255.255.255.0

ip virtual-router 102 priority 254 preempt

ip redundant-vip 102 128.131.2.72 shared

ip redundant-vip 102 128.131.2.73 shared

ip redundant-vip 102 128.131.2.3 shared

ip critical-service 102 gw-128.131.2

!*************************** GROUP ***************************

group ogawa2

add service ogawa2i

vip address 128.131.2.73

active

!************************** SERVICE **************************

service ogawa2i

ip address 192.168.7.73

active

It looks like, that the response does not comes through, if the source-port of the requesting server uses a port <1024.

Any ideas ??

2 Replies 2

Gilles Dufour
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

There are some ports for which we do not maitain flow information but 123 should not be one of them.

What software version are you using ?

A workaround could be to create the following content rules :

owner TEST

content NTP

vip address 128.131.2.73

protocol udp

port 123

add service ogawa2i

active

!

Let me know if this works.

Gilles.

SW-Version ist sg0710006s. The same problem is in 7.10 Build 3. We have a css11503.

Is there anywhere a list of ports, where flow-information is not maintained.

The above workaround works, but it has the disadvantage, that

now the server/port can be reached from outside as a regular service which may be complicate to block via ACLs.