Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Community Member

SLB and GLBP

Hi, is anyone aware of any restrictions or problems with running SLB in conjunction with GLBP. We have two 6509's running GLBP with two servers connected using IOS SLB directed mode but it only works intermittently.

Cheers

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Silver

Re: SLB and GLBP

GLBP allows a set of routers to have ARP resolutions loabalanced across the devices, thereby spreading the work around to each of the devices.This only really works (SLB aside) if you have many gw's feeding the GLBP'd cluster. The reason SLB won't work is that for SLB connections uplink and downlink packets need to go through the same device and GLBP has no way of enforcing this. The SLB config that can work with GLBP is per-packet loadbalancing where SLB keeps no state and can handle asymmetric responses. Typically GLBP is good at a layer2-to-layer3 edge where there are lots of common devices; that means mostly end stations, sometimes simple server farms. When more sophisticated load balancing is desired, SLB, CSM, etc. is the answer.

1 REPLY
Silver

Re: SLB and GLBP

GLBP allows a set of routers to have ARP resolutions loabalanced across the devices, thereby spreading the work around to each of the devices.This only really works (SLB aside) if you have many gw's feeding the GLBP'd cluster. The reason SLB won't work is that for SLB connections uplink and downlink packets need to go through the same device and GLBP has no way of enforcing this. The SLB config that can work with GLBP is per-packet loadbalancing where SLB keeps no state and can handle asymmetric responses. Typically GLBP is good at a layer2-to-layer3 edge where there are lots of common devices; that means mostly end stations, sometimes simple server farms. When more sophisticated load balancing is desired, SLB, CSM, etc. is the answer.

205
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease to create content