Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

SNAT Context with multiple VIP interface

   Hi,

The traffic is coming from 172.16.0.0/22 network to the the multiple VIP address of ACE context given in below config and these VIPs vlans are allowed as trunk interface to Core Switch. Is there any performance issue or wrong routing can be caused with mutiple VIP interface in the same context.

VIP network config.

interface vlan 105

  ip address 10.80.9.5 255.255.255.0

  peer ip address 10.80.9.6 255.255.255.0

  access-group input ALL

  nat-pool 5 10.80.9.7 10.80.9.7 netmask 255.255.255.0 pat

  service-policy input VLAN105

  no shutdown

interface vlan 206

  ip address 10.80.43.5 255.255.255.0

  peer ip address 10.80.43.6 255.255.255.0

  access-group input ALL

  nat-pool 6 10.80.43.7 10.80.43.7 netmask 255.255.255.0 pat

  service-policy input VLAN206

  no shutdown

interface vlan 2106

  ip address 172.16.139.5 255.255.255.0

  peer ip address 172.16.139.6 255.255.255.0

  access-group input ALL

  nat-pool 7 172.16.139.7 172.16.139.7 netmask 255.255.255.0 pat

  service-policy input VLAN2106

  no shutdown

1 REPLY
Bronze

SNAT Context with multiple VIP interface

Hi,

There is not problem with a configuration like this.  Actually you can have a mix of route-mode and bridge-mode in the same Context without any problem.

---------------------
Cesar R
ANS Team

--------------------- Cesar R ANS Team
476
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies