Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

IPv6 for private and public usage?

Hi everyone,

I am confused in IPv6, i was research some RFC but certainly i dont knows if i choose the correct. i need to configure some cisco stuff with IPv6 and i want to know what ipv6 use for private and public.

Unique local for private (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193)

 | 7 bits |1|  40 bits   |  16 bits  |          64 bits           |
      +--------+-+------------+-----------+----------------------------+
      | Prefix |L| Global ID  | Subnet ID |        Interface ID        |
      +--------+-+------------+-----------+----------------------------+

   Where:

      Prefix            FC00::/7 prefix to identify Local IPv6 unicast
                        addresses.

      L                 Set to 1 if the prefix is locally assigned.
                        Set to 0 may be defined in the future.  See
                        Section 3.2 for additional information.

      Global ID         40-bit global identifier used to create a
                        globally unique prefix.  See Section 3.2 for
                        additional information.

      Subnet ID         16-bit Subnet ID is an identifier of a subnet
                        within the site.

      Interface ID      64-bit Interface ID as defined in [ADDARCH].

Global unicast for pyblic (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3587)

 | 3 |     45 bits         |  16 bits  |       64 bits              |
    +---+---------------------+-----------+----------------------------+
    |001|global routing prefix| subnet ID |       interface ID         |
    +---+---------------------+-----------+----------------------------+

Site-Local is depreceated (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.5.7)

Everyone's tags (4)
1 REPLY

Hi Jorge,

Hi Jorge,

Ask yourself why you are wanting to implement ULA in your IPv6 network. If it is because it bears a striking resemblance to RFC1918 and its functionality, and that is a design paradigm you're familiar with, then you should reconsider. Private addressing was conceived due to address scarcity, something that IPv6 does not suffer from!

If I were you, I'd use GUA throughout your network and at the very least protect it with a perimeter firewall.

cheers,

Seb.

151
Views
5
Helpful
1
Replies