cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
685
Views
6
Helpful
2
Replies

No Correlation ID returned to CUCM Routing client

Ayodeji Okanlawon
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Gents,

I have UCCE 10.5 with CVP 10.5 deployed comprehensive deployment model.

I was trying to test calls from CUCM CTI route point and I observed a very strange behaviour.

I noticed that calls were failing when I diall any of my dialled numbers from CUCM and after looking at the logs here is what I found

On router I see router generates the corID for the call

+++

01:23:52:458 ra-rtr Trace: (65546 x 0 : 0 0) NewCall: CID=(152133,117), DN=88000, ANI=+442038803154, CED=, RCID=5000, MRDID=1, CallAtVRU=0, OpCode=0.
01:23:52:459 ra-rtr Trace: (65546 x 8 : 0 0) TransferToVRU: Label=8991111000, CorID=8, VRUID=5000, RCID=5000.

+++

++ CUCM  logs ++

When I looked at the CUCM logs, I do not see the corid, hence when CUCM sent the call to CVP, its treating the call as a "ICM New Call" instead of a correlation id routed call and the call fails subsequently

<< CUCM CTI logs ++ notice the corid is missing ( ignore timestamp, time on server is different>>

00091667.002 |23:19:01.317 |AppInfo  |[CTI-APP] [CTIHandler::processIncomingMessage]     CTI   LineCallRedirectRequest    ( seq#=37  LH=1|20  CH=1|26379722 destination=8991111000 calling search space=0 original called=0 redirect reason=0 unconditional redirect=0 modifiedCallingNumber= modifiedCallingType=0 FeaturePriority=1 Application XML Data=)
00091668.000 |23:19:01.317 |SdlSig   |CtiLineCallRedirectReq                 |ready                          |CTIHandler(1,200,22,1)           |CTIHandler(1,200,22,1)           |1,200,13,1.1716^192.168.131.70^*

I then went back to PIM logs and I observed that the corid is missing from there as well.

+++ PIM Logs +++

01:23:52:459 PG1A-pim1 Trace: ProcessCSTARouteSelect: crossRefID=65546, RTRCallKey=152133.117, label 8991111000 callID=16792257.
01:23:52:459 PG1A-pim1 Trace: ProcessRouteSelect - OPC xref 65546 corresponds to CallMgr xref 12.
01:23:52:467 PG1A-pim1 Trace: RouteEnd: XRefID=12 ErrValue=0.
01:23:52:467 PG1A-pim1 Trace: ApplicationProtocol::RecvRouteEndEventMsg - CallMgr XrefID 12 corresponds to OPC xref 65546 .
01:23:52:470 PG1A-pim1 Trace: CallCleared: CID=16792257 ConnDevID=/0 LocalConn=-1 Cause=1015UniqueID=0000000000003AC1019285E000000000 .
01:23:52:470 PG1A-pim1 Trace: CSTA CALL CLEARED, TelephonyDriver::CallCleared: SENT TO OPC
     CallID     = 16792257 DeviceID =   DeviceType = Static     LocalState = NONE

Gents,

Is there something I am missing here :)

NB: That this doesnt happen when CVP is the routing client. I see the label + corid on the response back to CVP when a call request is sent to UCCE

Please rate all useful posts
1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Sasikumar Divvela
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Can you check if there is any Network VRU assigned to CUCM Routing client in PG explorer. I have seen this issue when a VRU is assigned to CUCM routing client.

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

Sasikumar Divvela
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Can you check if there is any Network VRU assigned to CUCM Routing client in PG explorer. I have seen this issue when a VRU is assigned to CUCM routing client.

I tend to agree. In the early days of CVP with the Type 5 and Type 7 NVRUs, you had to set the default NVRU (I can't recall which type you had to set it to but it was complicated); but I think when the Type 10 was created, the NVRU should be set on the CVP PG (Advanced tab) instead.

Perhaps you have a default NVRU set in the System Information page? Not quite sure if this is a problem.

I do know that these days we don't set a default NVRU on the System Info page. On the Advanced tab of the UCM PG there should be no NVRU set; on the CVP PG it should be set to the CVP NVRU; on the MR PG it should be set to the Media Routing NVRU.

Regards,
Geoff