Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. If you'd prefer to explore, try our test area to get started. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

VLAN for voice and data - using IP communicator

Hi

We are implementing our contact centre on IPCC Enterprise v7.0 and I have the following questions:

a)

The agents will use IP Communicator as phone on their PCs. From the information I've got from an engineer, there will be only 1 VLAN for voice and data since both traffic will originate from 1 NIC, is that correct? I fear we might experience voice quality problem since both traffic will mingle with each other. Is there a solution?

b)

Is silent monitoring feasible when using IP Communicator?

Thanks for help.

Thierry

3 REPLIES
Bronze

Re: VLAN for voice and data - using IP communicator

yes that will be a problem, unless you have dual NIC's in your machines.

New Member

Re: VLAN for voice and data - using IP communicator

what would be the solution, if you have dual nics?

is there another way to get the communicator assigned the voice vlan than configuring the port on the switch manualy? because usualy a communicator user will not sit on one specific port.

Re: VLAN for voice and data - using IP communicator

In theory, if the NIC support 802.1q and/or 802.1p, you could enable trust on that port to allow the PC to route voice traffic directly onto the voice VLAN. I say in theory becuase I have never done, nor do I know if IP Communicator will work with the NIC to flag the packets going out. In addition, this creates a potential security hole that could easily disrupt voice traffic.

In a LAN environment, voice can usually work on the same VLAN as data so long as 802.1p (prioritization) is enabled and the voice traffic is limited. The problem becomes the monitoring. Will voice and data on the same VLAN you need to SPAN all traffic to IPCC for monitoring, which probably will be problematic.

583
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies