Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Email Security Quick-links: ESA Product Support | SMA Product Support | Email Submission and Tracking Portal | Cisco SecurityHub
Current General Deployment (GD) Releases:
ESA: 11.0.0-264 WSA: 10.5.1-296 SMA: 11.0.0-115 Email Plug-in (Reporting): 1.0.1-048 Email Plug-in (Encryption): 1.0.0-036

New Member

Auto failover

Hi all,

Is it possible to implement auto failover between 2 Ironport C300 if
the active one is failure ?.

Thanks :) .

2 REPLIES
New Member

Re: Auto failover

Just play with the mx records.

Example:
mydomain.nl MX 10 firstC300
mydomain.nl MX 20 secondC300

New Member

Re: Auto failover

Why use an active/passive setup instead of active/active? Just have equal-preference MX records and let the traffic split. Then if one unit fails, the other gets the whole load. In addition to simplicity, this also keeps both units exercised, so you'll be less likely to be surprised by a spare that turns out to be bad, too.

In our case, we have a large stable of IronPort MGAs, so we use a single MX record and a load balancer to split the traffic, handle failure isolation, etc. But load balancers tend to be expensive, and may be outside the budget of a shop small enough to need only a pair of C300s.

162
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies