What's your general feeling about the Phishing volumes which are getting through ? Have you seen any differences between different locations ?
We have pretty big user community in Europe and US without major phishing problems (only few reports ) but we are getting a lot of reports (daily) from South Africa (with ~5000 users).
Our IronPort rules are similar for Africa than it's for rest of the world. We are also adding X-header if message is ranked as "suspected" SPAM but seems that all passed phishing messages are clean and not detected by IronPort.
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...