Welcome to the Cisco Networking Professionals Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn about the Smart Business Communications System for Small Businesses with Cisco expert Maulik Shah. Maulik has been with Cisco Systems for the past seven years. He has worked with Unified Communications & Voice over IP systems for the last five years as part of the Cisco Technical Assistance Center and Technical Marketing Team. He has helped design, deploy & troubleshoot multiple customer VoIP networks. In his current role as Technical Marketing Engineer, he is focused on Cisco Unified Communications 500 for Smart Business Communications Solutions (SBCS) & SIP trunking deployments. He is a CCIE (# 8422) in Routing & Switching and Voice. He received his Master's Degree from the University of Colorado Boulder in Electrical Engineering focusing on communications and a Bachelors Degree from University of Mumbai in Electrical & Telecommunications Engineering.
Remember to use the rating system to let Maulik know if you have received an adequate response.
Maulik might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Our moderators will post many of the unanswered questions in other discussion forums shortly after the event. This event lasts through October 23, 2009. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.
I got following error message with the cca and SA520. Can you help me. See attachment.
Mail address: firstname.lastname@example.org
The SA 500 is not yet supported as a managed device in CCA 2.1 - please see the list below for managed devices:
SA 500 is targeted to be a managed device in CCA around the Dec 09 timeframe. For now you can configure the SA500 using the embedded configuration utility - see link below on getting started:
following Problem . I Used a CISCO876 to connect from outside the LAN with ISDN.
I can login, an all functions are OK.
Problem: always , after 120 secounds, the router disconnect the ISDN-Line.
In my Config I have no "dialer idle-timeout"
Where is the Trick ?
I am afraid that this is not something I can provide a simple answer for as its not part of the SBCS portfolio. You would be best off asking this on:
You may need to check "deb isdn q931" & "deb isdn q921" to see what the cause of the disconnect is.
I would not be able to speak to roadmap plans for CUCIMOC as its outside of the Small Business product suite - please post the question in below forum:
what's cisco target position for UC500,UC520 , UC540 and cisco 1861 cause customer will get most benefit and valuable with 28xx series,and the next will release for 29xx series.
Interesting question - I do not think we have had a lot of sales for the 28xx in the small business space (< 100 users). This does not mean you cannot use the 28xx in such deployments, with the UC500 series, the focus is more about keeping things simple with fixed hardware configuration, default configs, CCA GUI and the right price points. If you are selling the 28xx (and the new 29xx) - glad to hear that and continue doing so :).
I need some help i have the AP Cisco WAP4410N and im trying to do:
- The WAP4410N as REPEATER but without any key of encryption in windows vista and windows seven appears something about a PIN but i don't want any PIN to be shown.
Well that is easy to resolve because you click in the option to procead anyway and you connection is made but when you have a Encryption Key the first thing that appears is the PIN and you click to not use Pin but to use Encryption Key when you put the KEy is shows you an error...
The funny thing is if you put our WAP4410N as REPEATER it will work as AP . Without any AP sending the signal to it.
I just wanna do this, Aironet as AP and with an encryption KEY of 128Bits and the WAP4410N as Repeater to make the signal stronger in Blind spots coul you help me please??
Please see this article...other people have more like the same problem..
Thank you i will be waiting for the response
For the PIN issue with Vista - check the below doc:
For the Aironet AP - what is the model of the AP. If you do use WDS - there is no standard so interop may have an issue.
I have installed the CME upgrade to my flash drive; I am trying to utilize the GUI interface and have set the http parameters but the ccme.html file does not exist. I have installed cme full 188.8.131.52 tar file and am using Internet explorer 8.0. How do I get the GUI to come up?
email is email@example.com
Few things to check:
- do you have the tar file copied and extracted to the CME flash?
- have you configured the CME as below:
We have bought 3 of Linksys SRW248G4 sw.
But web interface is NOT working with IE8 (though it is said in Release notes, it works with IE5.5+)
Please, help anyone!.. we can't set up our sw!!!
Not working implies that you get a page not found when you login or you get nothing?
Other related posts on this issue:
If you don't get anywhere and the switch is still under warranty you should contact the Small Business Support Center at: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html if you haven't done so already.
Error: Object expected
Msxml is installed (and is of the latest version). It's just a buggy software.
It works with IE5.5 to IE7, but not with IE8. If the software gets updated at all the hosts in our LAN, we will not be able to configure the sw... And it is really bad.
We have tested it with Windows server 2003 and IE8, with Windows XP and IE8... nothing helps. It just does not work.
Not mentioning that the sw is completely unconfigurable in UNIX-only environment... as it relies at the M$ client side "technology"...
The switch does offer CLI via console or telnet - not sure if that helps in your UNIX environment:
Based on a quick search - it appears the SRW GUI has not been tested with IE8 - we recommend using the older versions.
I will notify the product team to ensure we test IE8 on the SRW and make it compatible but for now it is a limitation.
THANK YOU very much!
Cos' it's a kinda nightmare for us at the moment...
CLI is very poor!... it only allows one to configure some basic functions... not VLANs or smth. of that kind..
We have emailed cisco tech support lots of times, and got NO answer, still, it is obvious, the web appliance is really not working with the browser (IE8).
We hope the engineers will release the new firmware... and whenever it is possible to add more functionality to the CLI part, we'd appreciate it!... And if the web interface was compatible with firefox it would be great too!
P.S. There are still some unresolved, not documented, bugs in the present web interface that revealed themselves as we tested it in IE6 and 7. Should we report them?
I see you posted the same on the Support Community forum. I would urge you to attach the info on this post there as well and also list any issues you have with:
- CLI functionality
- errors on GUI with IE6/7
I will have the appropriate folks respond on that forum
Hi Maulik, I have an issue regarding CUE and SIP Trunk.
My SIP provider requires me to register to its gateway, so I used an ephone-dn to register to the gateway.
The problem is that after configuring trunk, I cannot access CUE, as the CCME is forwarding calls that should go to CUE to the SIP Trunk.
I attach configuration, and a copy of the logs, where you can see that CUE has IP 172.16.2.6, and that CCME is trying to send the call tu 192.168.1.2 which is the SIP trunk.
Thanks very much!
Check the link below:
This should cover CME SIP Trunk configuration and also allow forwarded calls to not go over the SIP trunk.
We have recently installed IPphone SPA962 together with sidecar SPA932.
I am interested in finding the combined power consumption of the two parts.
In the datasheet it says SPA962 itself takes 5W, while for SPA932 the only info. is that it takes power from the IPphone itself. I need to calculate if my POE switch can support it.
1 Expansion Module with all the LED turned on consumes an additional 1.65W. If you add 2 of them, it will consume 3.3W
One more issue with Linksys SRW248G4:
One is NOT able to add a port to many untagged VLANs...
No, you may... but it will NOT work: all the untagged packets go to the PVID VLAN, configured for the port.
This way, we are not able to have a multihomed (with many IPs) host with one physical NIC not supporting tagging.
The question is:
Will this be corrected in a new firmware release?..
Cos' all known, even the most primitive, sw, offering even only port-based VLANs, allow one to add a port to multiple VLANS.
I see you posted this on the support community:
Sent you a message - lets do this via email if it works better.