12-01-2011 02:16 AM - edited 03-11-2019 02:57 PM
Hi all,
I am currently writing up the procedure for doing this upgrade on our current firewalls (active/standby failover pair) and wanted to confirm a few things.
1 We are upgrading from 8.2(2) to 8.4(2) so need to run "no names" and "no nat-control" before upgrade to avoid any issues. Will I need to do this on both active and standby? (I am presuming I will!!)
2 I will also be doing the same upgrade on another of our networks once this one is complete. Again we have a failover pair but they are running multiple contexts. Are there any other issues I need to be aware of with this configuration? Where should I run the above commands on a multi-context firewall etc?
The procedure I am intending to use is as follows:
Backup configs
Copy Files to both firewalls
Set boot on both to new image
Save changes!
Reload Standby
Once Standby is up do "no failover active" on Active
Reload "Old" Active
Once "Old" Active is up do "no failover active" on "Old" Standby
Verify all is running as expected
Save configs
Redo "names" command
I have tested this on a single firewall but I have no failover pair to test on and would rather not have any surprises!!
I will, in all probability, be carrying out this change at 1am to avoid production hours, is there any advantage in doing it as a downtime upgrade (i.e. will it be simpler and less troublesome???).
Think thats everything!!!
Thanks in advance for any help!!
Tim
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-01-2011 02:27 AM
Hi Tim,
Your procedure is absolutely correct and definitely the right thing to do it off-production hours, to be able to handle any unexpected issues. In multiple context you would need to run these commands in every context. The steps are right as it shoudl be, and I don't see anything wrong in it at all.
Thanks,
Varun
12-01-2011 02:39 AM
Hey Tim,
I would also not be able to do anything without you (literally) , it's always good to help you as well. The no names and no nat-control just needs to be pushed on the active firewall and it would be replicated to the standby as well. In multiple context you need to do it in every context that you have created.
Thanks,
Varun
12-01-2011 02:27 AM
Hi Tim,
Your procedure is absolutely correct and definitely the right thing to do it off-production hours, to be able to handle any unexpected issues. In multiple context you would need to run these commands in every context. The steps are right as it shoudl be, and I don't see anything wrong in it at all.
Thanks,
Varun
12-01-2011 02:33 AM
Thanks again Varun, don't know what I would do without you!!
12-01-2011 02:35 AM
Varun,
So to confirm, the "no names" and "no nat-control" I need to do on both active and standby yes??? And for the 2nd network I need to do them for each context on each firewall???
Tim
12-01-2011 02:39 AM
Hey Tim,
I would also not be able to do anything without you (literally) , it's always good to help you as well. The no names and no nat-control just needs to be pushed on the active firewall and it would be replicated to the standby as well. In multiple context you need to do it in every context that you have created.
Thanks,
Varun
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: