cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
4938
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

denied due to NAT reverse path failure on ASA 8.3

yong khang NG
Level 5
Level 5

hi, i am doing remote-access VPN, client connection using AnyConnect

group policies all setup, but just having this error mesage

Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection  for icmp src outside:10.10.5.50 dst inside:10.10.10.1 (type 8, code 0)  denied due to NAT reverse path failure  (10.10.5.0 being the VPN Pool)

the only NAT i perform on the box is the LAN xlate to outside interface IP towards internet connection.

my outside interface ip is 202.152..8x.3x, i intend to let remote user connect to the 10.10.x.x LAN network, with use the 10.10.5.0 as the VPN pool to route in the LAN.

This is the NAT i create:-

object network Mxx_Ix_SUPERTNET
nat (any,outside) dynamic interface

any clue on it? what i search on other forum mean that i am missing one static NAT for return path forwarding? can guide on this, i thought create on NAT will apply on bidectional..

thank you

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Jennifer Halim
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

You would need to create NAT exemption as follows:

object network obj-10.10.0.0

     subnet 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0

object network obj-10.10.5.0

     subnet 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0

nat (inside,outside) source static obj-10.10.0.0 obj-10.10.0.0 destination static obj-10.10.5.0 obj-10.10.5.0

Hope that helps.

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

Jennifer Halim
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

You would need to create NAT exemption as follows:

object network obj-10.10.0.0

     subnet 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0

object network obj-10.10.5.0

     subnet 10.10.5.0 255.255.255.0

nat (inside,outside) source static obj-10.10.0.0 obj-10.10.0.0 destination static obj-10.10.5.0 obj-10.10.5.0

Hope that helps.

hi jennifer,

thanks for the reply.

just want to check out with you, i using the wizard to create the instance for the remote access VPN, and found out ASA8.3 NATexemption is doing Twice NAT way nowadays, on CLI check the config is same like what you're posting here.

just wonder why in VPN we need NAT exemption?

thanks

Yes, NAT exemption for VPN has always been there since earlier version of ASA. The reason why you need to configure NAT exemption for VPN is that you do not want to NAT the clear text traffic between the VPN subnets, or between the internal network towards the VPN Client pool, therefore, you need to create NAT exemption. Otherwise, it will fall under the default dynamic NAT policy that you have created, and it gets PATed to the outside interface ip address.

Hope that clears the confusion.

thanks jennifer.

there's a big changes at ASA8.3 compare to previous version. time to re-learn

thanks again for the guide

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card