03-26-2007 09:11 PM - edited 03-11-2019 02:52 AM
Hi,
Can anybody tell me which one mentioned in the subject is better to use in terms of enterprise deployment.
If somebody can give me a comparison sheet I'll will be very thankful.
Best Regards,
Rahim
03-26-2007 09:15 PM
We use a PIX 515, but are replacing it when it goes end of life in a few months. I dont think they are making a PIX anymore. The ASA is a replacement for it
03-26-2007 09:34 PM
If the comparision is only between PIX & ASA, I'd certainly recommend to go for ASA. Reasons are-
ASA can support IPS/CSC modules also, which gives it a capability of acting as any of the following-
* Content Security Edition OR
* IPS Edition
Above is along with ASA running as:
* Firewall Edition &
* VPN Edition
PIX can only run as above two, Firewall + VPN.
Moreover, there are plethora of features which are only available on ASA and not on PIX.
Now, if we also try comparing it with FWSM, FWSM can also act as only Firewall+VPN edition, however you need a Cat 6k or 7k Router to use this module. This module has much superior throughput than PIX/ASA, however it is best suited as a "internal" firewall and not a gateway firewall.
Note: I would still suggest to have a analysis done of your network and after reading through the data sheets only determine which would be the best solution for your enterprise.
Here are the links to data sheets for all the three-
ASA:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/index.html
PIX:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/
FWSM:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2706/ps4452/index.html
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Vibhor.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: