Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements
Step-by-Step Configuration and Troubleshooting Best Practices for the NGFW, NGIPS and AMP Technologies A Visual Guide to the Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)

nat or no nat

I have a diagram to help better explain what I'm wondering. I think I'll need to, but maybe not.

My ASA has a private address on the inside interface, and a public address on the outside. Will I need to nat if my device in front is natting for other traffic?

Thanks,

John

HTH, John *** Please rate all useful posts ***
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Bronze

Re: nat or no nat

Hi,

The question would be, does the fatpipe device have routes to your internal network?

If it does then there is no need to NAT on the ASA and you can have all your NAT in one place. If it doesn't have your internal networks in it's routing table then you will need to NAT on the ASA.

Regards

2 REPLIES
Bronze

Re: nat or no nat

Hi,

The question would be, does the fatpipe device have routes to your internal network?

If it does then there is no need to NAT on the ASA and you can have all your NAT in one place. If it doesn't have your internal networks in it's routing table then you will need to NAT on the ASA.

Regards

Re: nat or no nat

Thanks James! The Fatpipe doesn't have our internal networks set up. It just has an "internal gateway" of my ASA's public address. I'm converting from a Symantec firewall now, and I don't see where it's natting, but I've got nat enabled on the ASA.

Thanks again,

John

HTH, John *** Please rate all useful posts ***
289
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies
CreatePlease to create content