02-20-2007 12:52 PM - edited 03-11-2019 02:36 AM
When searching cisco.com for configuration examples on allowing PPTP through an PIX or an ASA I found the term PAT for Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP) in the 6.3 release notes. It is specifically for allowing multiple PPTP connections through the PIX.
Now when I look for configuration examples, everything says that it isn't possible to have multiple PPTP tunnels through a pix or asa.
So which is are the release notes right or the config examples?
Has this feature been dropped in 6.3?
Thanks,
Brian
Release Notes for 6.3:
Config Example:
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-21-2007 03:31 AM
Correcting myself..
When the PPTP server is behind a patted ip address, the connection would simply not work.
With clients behind a patted ip address, only first connection would work. Multiple connections would not work with out one to one translation.
I apologise for the wrong information.
HTH,
-Kanishka
02-21-2007 02:39 AM
Hi,
The part of the config example you are talking about, where it says that multiple pptp connection are not possible through PAT, is specifically for the scenario :
"PPTP with the Client Outside and the Server Inside"
When PPTP server is behind a patted ip address, only one connections is possible, and this is true for all Cisco devices.
When clients are behind a patted ip address, you need to add "fixup protocol pptp 1723" on the PIX for multiple PPTPT connections.
HTH,
-Kanishka
02-21-2007 03:31 AM
Correcting myself..
When the PPTP server is behind a patted ip address, the connection would simply not work.
With clients behind a patted ip address, only first connection would work. Multiple connections would not work with out one to one translation.
I apologise for the wrong information.
HTH,
-Kanishka
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide