cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
363
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies

per-session PAT and http replication in a failover (active/standby) pair

Hi,

I have ASA 9.1(2) and I'd like to implement per-session PAT to improve pat scalability. Can someone confirm me that switching from multisession to per-session PAT will not cause any nat or connectivity temporary disruption ?

 

I'd also like to enable http connection table replication (right now I have a plain stateful failover). Implementing can (I don't think so I know) cause any temporary connectivity disruption ? furthermore the firewall has some cpu overload sometimes, will http replication increase firewall cpu usage ?

 

Thank you

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Julio Carvajal
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Hello,

 

As Cisco recommends the Per-Session PAT should be used for hit-and-run traffic such as HTTP or HTTPS where you will avoing having the Xlate entry there for 30 seconds (default timeout) after the session is closed but it's not recommended for traffic like SIP so you will need to tweak the config to enable the feature only for what its needed.

 

In regards of the HTTP replication, there are not known issues about enabling this.

 

So do not worry about this 2 options.

 

Jcarvaja

CCIE 42930, 2xCCNP, JNCIS-SEC

For inmediate support http://iNetworks.cr

Julio Carvajal
Senior Network Security and Core Specialist
CCIE #42930, 2xCCNP, JNCIP-SEC

View solution in original post

3 Replies 3

Julio Carvajal
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Hello,

 

As Cisco recommends the Per-Session PAT should be used for hit-and-run traffic such as HTTP or HTTPS where you will avoing having the Xlate entry there for 30 seconds (default timeout) after the session is closed but it's not recommended for traffic like SIP so you will need to tweak the config to enable the feature only for what its needed.

 

In regards of the HTTP replication, there are not known issues about enabling this.

 

So do not worry about this 2 options.

 

Jcarvaja

CCIE 42930, 2xCCNP, JNCIS-SEC

For inmediate support http://iNetworks.cr

Julio Carvajal
Senior Network Security and Core Specialist
CCIE #42930, 2xCCNP, JNCIP-SEC

Thanks, everything is working fine with no problems :) and with no connectivity disruption as new commands where applied. What I noticed is xlate dynamic type entries decreasing but also connections decreasing, don't know why actually about the second one.

Hello,

 

Excellent to hear that.

Remember that the xlate entries will be cleared faster so you might not even be able to see them when you do a show xlate as the entry might be already deleted.

Regards

Julio Carvajal
Senior Network Security and Core Specialist
CCIE #42930, 2xCCNP, JNCIP-SEC
Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card