Removing the nat satatement would affect some traffic if this firewall is used like a router that doesnt have nat enabled by default. That statement might have been issued on purpose to not to spend time on detailed traffic definitions with statics.
If you decide to remove that NAT statement, make sure you enter the following
Question, I did as you suggested and also added the nat statement you recommended after removing the others and no connection by those ip addreses was able to be made. i also tried it without your recommended nat stement and putting the exisiting ones back in with no luck. Since their is a site to site vpn involved, wouldn't similiar changes need to be made on the other side? (They do not have access to the other side device)
We have configured the outside and inside Interface with official ipv6 adresses, set a default route on outside Interface to our router, we also have definied a rule , which also gets hits, to permit tcp from inside Interface to any6.
In Syslog I also se...