06-19-2008 02:03 PM - edited 03-11-2019 06:02 AM
When you run a packet trace, can you put any random source port above 1024 like TCP would normally pick?
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-20-2008 12:06 PM
The approach you use better simulates the actual behavior of the OS TCP/IP Stack. Usually ports above 1024 are chosen for source ports as the lower ports are reserved. But in most cases it does not matter that much because the real point is to test the destination server (80 in your example).
Regards
Farrukh
06-20-2008 03:31 AM
Yes Chris, that can be done without any issues. It is just simulation anyway.
Regards
Farrukh
06-20-2008 11:30 AM
Farrukh, thank you for your response.
I think I'm more curious whether or not I'm using the packet tracer correctly. I've seen some of my coworkers put the same port for source and destination, and it didn't make sense to me. (For example, when testing http, they would put the source port as 80 as well as the destination.) I believe that this is the incorrect way to use the packet tracer. What do you think?
Thanks,
Chris
06-20-2008 12:06 PM
The approach you use better simulates the actual behavior of the OS TCP/IP Stack. Usually ports above 1024 are chosen for source ports as the lower ports are reserved. But in most cases it does not matter that much because the real point is to test the destination server (80 in your example).
Regards
Farrukh
06-20-2008 01:32 PM
This is exactly what I was thinking. Thank you very much for your help!
Chris
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: