Re: static (dmz,inside) why not static(inside,dmz).....
consider two hosts that reside on the inside of a firewall, using private IP addresses 192.168.100.100 and 192.168.100.170. Outbound connections from these hosts should appear as 22.214.171.124 and 126.96.36.199, respectively. Because the hosts must always receive the same mapped addresses, static NAT should be used
The static NAT entries could be configured with the following commands:
The netmask is given as a host mask (255.255.255.255), because each translation is applied to a single host address
If your firewall has other "medium-security" interfaces (security levels between 0 and 100), there are some additional considerations. These interfaces are usually used as demilitarized zone (DMZ) networks, where services are made available to the public networks while offering a certain level of security. DMZ networks are then isolated from the highest-security inside networks, although their services can be accessed from the inside.
Outbound access from a medium-security interface to a lower one is really no different from the inside interface. You still need to configure the following:
Address translation with the static command or with the global and nat commands. This allows hosts on the DMZ to appear on the outside with a valid address.
An access list applied to the medium-security interface. This allows hosts on the DMZ to be permitted to initiate inbound connections toward the inside interface. The same access list also controls outbound connections from the DMZ.
Login to the FXOS chassis manager.
Direct your browser to https://hostname/, and log-in using the user-name and password.
Go to Help > About and check the current version:
Check the current version availa...
We have configured the outside and inside Interface with official ipv6 adresses, set a default route on outside Interface to our router, we also have definied a rule , which also gets hits, to permit tcp from inside Interface to any6.
In Syslog I also se...