Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Access or Trunk question?

Just wondering if there is ever a scenario where two switches connected to one another should not be trunked?

For example I have switch A connected to Switch B

Switch A config:

interface GigabitEthernet1/1

switchport

switchport access vlan 100

switchport mode access

Switch B config:

interface GigabitEthernet1/1

switchport access vlan 100

switchport mode access

Think of Switch A has the hub with various switches spoked off of it all connecting as a different vlan. (100, 101,102 etc...)

it just doesn't make sense to me why it was configured this way. I would think the interfaces between the switches should be trunked? However, only a single vlan is passed so is it necessary?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: Access or Trunk question?

If you only need 1 vlan on each switch then there is no reason to use a trunk link and it is perfectly valid to just use a switchport access configuration.

However gererally speaking you would want to have at least 2 vlans on each switch one for data and the other for management. You don't have to a separate management vlan but it is recommended best practice.

Jon

2 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Blue

Re: Access or Trunk question?

If you only need 1 vlan on each switch then there is no reason to use a trunk link and it is perfectly valid to just use a switchport access configuration.

However gererally speaking you would want to have at least 2 vlans on each switch one for data and the other for management. You don't have to a separate management vlan but it is recommended best practice.

Jon

New Member

Re: Access or Trunk question?

Thank you for the response.

129
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies