Re: benifits of point to point over multipoint on frame relay
This is a big area of discussion and difficult to summarise. There are pro's and con's for configuring frame-relay on p2p, p2m and on the physical interface. It really depends on your design requirements. P2P as the name suggests just has 2 devices connected while P2M can be hub and spoke or full/partial mesh. routing protocols work in different ways depending on how the frame-relay is configured (see ospf network types and eigrp/rip split horizon). The choice of frame-relay interface also has implication on how multicast will work.
So to summarise, if you have many frame PVC's in a hub and spoke topology and use P2P you will end up with lots of subinterface which may be undesirable. P2M can get around this issue as the spoke will only need one interface, but there are other issues to think about if you use P2M.
This is actually a pretty cool feature, i didn't even know it existed until I was looking for a solution to advertise a subnet (prefix in BGP talk), only if a certain condition existed. This is exactly what conditional advertisements does
j ai une question j ai achete un routeur cisco 887VA-k9 , je le configuré avec la configuration ci- dessous
si je le lier avec mon pc portable sur l un de ses ports directement ça marche toute est bien ( la connexion internet + m...
Attached policy provides CLI access to the Cisco 4G router over text messaging. Two files are in the attached .tar file:
2. PDF with instructions on how to load and use the .tcl file.