04-07-2006 05:18 AM - edited 03-05-2019 11:50 AM
Why did Cisco decide to have two different types of OS's? (CATOS and IOS) Are then any beinfits from one to the other?
Do both OS's use Cisco's proprietry Spanning Tree Protocals, PVST and MISTP?
Regards and thanks.
Mike.
04-07-2006 05:46 AM
Probably it is more correct to say that it just happened to them because Cisco wanted to grow. To realize a share of the switching market they aquired other companies with products that Cisco expected to be successfull. Catalyst switches were one of these.
Then Cisco had to sell them asap to make their aquisition pay off. But these non-cisco products were never designed to run under the IOS and were therefore incorporated in the Cisco-product range with little more changes than a suitable black/blue painting and the Cisco logo.
The long term goal is (or has been) to incorporate all functionality on all devices in the IOS. You can see that Cisco has made considerable progress in this effort but I would be surprised if the CatOS was to disappear within the next 3 years.
The same approach is chosen for other non-cisco products like the PIX firewall and the VPN concentrators.
Regards,
Leo
04-07-2006 06:41 AM
Thanks for that Leo, very informative.
Last question is Do both OS's, CATOS and IOS use Cisco's proprietary Spanning Tree Protocols, PVST and MISTP?
Or do they work differently?
Just wanted to know if there both nice and compatible.
04-07-2006 06:48 AM
Hi Michael,
Yes, both CatOS and IOS support PVST and MISTP. However, while PVST is Cisco proprietary, MISTP is an IEEE standard (802.1s).
HTH,
Bobby
*Please rate helpful posts.
04-07-2006 06:54 AM
Many thanks.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide