Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

EtherChannel

So when you have redundant trunk links between swithes, and STP had blocked one ports of the links, it is a waste of resources NOT to use EtherChannel. Is this correct? EtherChannel allows you to aggregate the bandwidth of the two links, so in effect, we get more data from one switch to the other. Correct?

5 REPLIES
Hall of Fame Super Silver

Re: EtherChannel

Yes with Etherchannel the Spanning Tree sees only a single entity and all of the links within the Etherchannel are active and carrying traffic with none of them blocked by Spanning Tree.

HTH

Rick

Super Bronze

Re: EtherChannel

Richard already answered your primary question, but BTW, although EtherChannel provides more bandwidth between devices, it's not the same as having a single link with that bandwidth. Reason being, EtherChannel statically "hashes" traffic between its links. I.e. one link can be at 100% while others at 0%.

Re: EtherChannel

Hi Joseph

That really depends on the load sharing algorithm you have in use on the Port-Channel. The 6500's can use port as an option which allows quite fine LB of connections.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml

Super Bronze

Re: EtherChannel

Adam,

EtherChannel load sharing algorithm is very important, since a poor choice (or lack of [equipment] choice) can lead to the situtation I described happening all the time, but even the best possible choice doesn't guarantee it won't happen.

The Achilles' heel (as far as I know) is one flow is always limited to one link. LB to link is always deterministic and doesn't respond to actual utilization.

Only reason I mentioned the issue at all (edit - especially in this particular forum topic), some might initially think EtherChannel always provides x*links improved performance.

However, I'm not trying to advance a "why not" but instead, a better understanding of the technology (which your reference will also provide).

Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: EtherChannel

I don't know if this is relevant for this topic, but, coming soon to the nearest Cisco 6500/7600 series of switches near you ...

Virtual PortChannels: Building Networks without Spanning Tree Protocol

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9402/white_paper_c11-516396.html

189
Views
0
Helpful
5
Replies