Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

ip scheme overlap in BGP

We have numerous branches Wan'd via bgp with a 10.x.0.0/16 scheme. A consultant to a stub like portion of our network wants to inject a 10.x.0.0/12 "supernet" how he put's it scheme. If for instance then the question is put to me whether a 10.120.0.0/16 network and a 10.120.0.0/12 network are advertised, will there be any chance of overlapping addresses? I should know this...my inclination is no, but our senior network tech has some reservations.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: ip scheme overlap in BGP

Not quite. 10.130.0.0/12 does not exist as it has an inconsistent mask. The prefix would be 10.128.0.0/12. You are right that you should not permit anything in the range 10.128.0.0/16 to 10.143.0.0/16 to be injected from anywhere else as all those addresses would be covered by the 10.128.0.0/12 injection.

Kevin Dorrell

Luxembourg

3 REPLIES

Re: ip scheme overlap in BGP

The "super-sub-net" 10.120.0.0/12 does not exist as such. If it is a /12, then the second octet starts at a multiple of 16, for example 10.112.0.0/12. The "super-sub-net" would occupy the range 10.112.0.0 to 10.127.255.255. If that is the case, you should avoid using 10.x.0.0/16 (where 112 <= x < 128) anywhere else.

Another way of looking at it is that the "super-sub-net" will occupy the space of 16 of your standard subnets.

Kevin Dorrell

Luxembourg

New Member

Re: ip scheme overlap in BGP

So therefore if we were speaking of a potential injection of 10.130.0.0/12 address....that would be within the 10.128.0.0-10.143.255.255 range and 128 <=130<=144 ?? WE therefore should not permit that range of addresses to be injected if we already advertise a 10.130.0.0/16 network from a major section of our wan???? Thanks for your detailed response. Much appreciated!!!!!!!!

Re: ip scheme overlap in BGP

Not quite. 10.130.0.0/12 does not exist as it has an inconsistent mask. The prefix would be 10.128.0.0/12. You are right that you should not permit anything in the range 10.128.0.0/16 to 10.143.0.0/16 to be injected from anywhere else as all those addresses would be covered by the 10.128.0.0/12 injection.

Kevin Dorrell

Luxembourg

177
Views
0
Helpful
3
Replies