Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

Aironet LAP 1140 vs LAP1040

Hi to all,

Could someone please tell me the differences between these two AP families (Aironet 1140 vs Aironet1040) ?

I've seen that the LAP version of the 1040 doesn't support the feature Extended Coverage..what is this feature about? Antenna specifications?

Moreover these LAP could be use in combination with:

- WLC 21XX Series and

- Switch 802.3af compatible (up to 15.4W per port)


Thnx for the support


Everyone's tags (7)
Hall of Fame Super Gold

Re: Aironet LAP 1140 vs LAP1040

1040 doesn't have MIMO.

1040 is a "cut-down" version of the 1140 and cost less.

New Member

Re: Aironet LAP 1140 vs LAP1040

actually the 1040 supports MIMO , however it supports 2x2 and the 1140 supports 2x3

they both work with the standard .11af power .

i guess the only difference between the two is the the 2x2 ( 1040 ) and 2x3 (1140 ) spiral streams

New Member

Re: Aironet LAP 1140 vs LAP1040

So as I have supposed the basic difference are the MIMO Streams: 3TX/3/RX on the 1140 and ony 2TX/2RX on the 1040...

but on the CCO a pdf "at a glance" regarding the Aironet AP states that the 1140 have also these features which are not present on the 1040:

- Extended Coverage (any info found on the CCO regarding this...)

- Multimedia (Voice Video)

- Cisco ClientLink (interesting feature for mixed environment g/n and a/n)

- Cisco Bandselect

obviously price came also as a difference ;-)

thanks to all for the replies...

I think I will go with the 1140 Family on the WLC2125 (also if the interfaces are not Gigabit so I won't be able to support full 802.11n but sure to have better performace that traditiona 802.11g)


Re: Aironet LAP 1140 vs LAP1040

Just a small correction, the 1140 is 2x3:2 and  the 1040 is 2x2:2 ..

__________________________________________________________________________________________ "Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin ___________________________________________________________
New Member

Re: Aironet LAP 1140 vs LAP1040

Hi George,

you mean 2x3:2 that I've 3x streams for the TX flows and 3x streams for the RX flows on the AP1140 Family, right?



Re: Aironet LAP 1140 vs LAP1040


T - Transmit

R - Receive

S - Spaitial

You will fine 802.11n with the following flavors:






Cisco Aps support 2x2:2 or 2x3:2. Atheros will have their 3x3:3 chips coming out in April. Not sure what Cisco's road map is to support it. The spatial is your "money". Each spatial equates to 150mb, so you will see 3x3:3 equates to 450 mb.Thats why with Cisco APs and others, you will only ever get 300 with xXx:2.

** EDIT **

Let me add further, 2 on the transmit means you will use no more than 2 antennas to TX on. 3 on the receive means you will use 3 antennas to rx on. The spatial is your streams. if you have a 2 stream AP, that the most streams you will have. AND, thats if your environment is favorable to use 2 streams... Just because it can do 2, doesn't mean it will always do 2 .. it takes advantage of multipath ...

802.11n although by standard could support  600 4x4:4, its VERY unlikely we will see that in the enterprise. Atheros mentioned they will not support development of the 4x4:4 chip. Why you ask ? They said that 802.11ac should be a quick ratification.  802.11ac, you will be able to do 8x8:8, hence GIG over wireless.

Make sense?

Please rememeber to rate helpful post ..

__________________________________________________________________________________________ "Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin ___________________________________________________________