Cisco Support Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Announcements

Attention: The Community will be in read-only mode on 12/14/2017 from 12:00 am pacific to 11:30 am.

During this time you will only be able to see content. Other interactions such as posting, replying to questions, or marking content as helpful will be disabled for few hours.

We apologize for the inconvenience while we perform important updates to the Community.

New Member

WAP general coverage limit

A customer wants Wireless access in a small area which is 250 yds outside their door, across a parking lot. My question, would signal from a 1200 WAP, with mast mounted antennas, reach this area or should I setup a bridge?

1 REPLY
Green

Re: WAP general coverage limit

Mast-mounted sector antenna(s) should work OK ... the usual stuff applies for line-of-sight, etc.

A bridge would work OK too ... a dual band 1230/40 where the "b" band feeds the clients and the "a" band is the "backbone" link back to the main site. This is basically how Cisco and Nortel are implementing their "Mesh" solution.

You "probably" don't want to run 802.11g to the clients here (using the bridge), every client after the first would tecnically be an oversubscription .... depends on the traffic patterns, activity levels and all the usual stuff.

Eleven Meg to the client for productivity apps and Internet surfing should be enough bandwidth.

It's pretty much a toss up. Given the choice of either, I think I'd go with the bridge for most things .... maybe go with the mast-mounted sectors if more bandwidth (than 11Mbps) is needed.

Mandatory disclaimer: A good site survey would likely give you the aboslute information you'd need to make your best choice.

Good Luck

Scott

338
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies
CreatePlease to create content