Cisco Support Community
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Welcome to Cisco Support Community. We would love to have your feedback.

For an introduction to the new site, click here. And see here for current known issues.

New Member

IDSM-2 "redundancy" in a single chassis

I understand how IDSM-2 redundancy could work having two 6500's...but what do you do when you are doing inline vlan pairs and the IDSM-2 fails and is no longer there to bridge the vlans together? How can the switch be setup to bridge the vlans in the event that the IDSM-2 fails?

Also, instead of pairing all the vlans that have SVI's on the FWSM, could I just pair the FWSM's VLAN/SVI on the MSFC with another vlan and get the same effect as pairing all the vlans that are on the FWSM? Thanks.


Re: IDSM-2 "redundancy" in a single chassis

I havn't tried this inside a 6500 chassis, but this works externally:

Set up your in-line sensors as multiple alternate paths connecting the two VLANs together and use spanning tree to assign one sensor path a higher STP cost. Once the primary sensor fails the traffic should re-route to the standby sensor. If you play with the STP settings you can get the switchover time down under a second.

New Member

Re: IDSM-2 "redundancy" in a single chassis

I am not sure what you mean by "externally." this is an IDSM-2 which is a blade in the 6500 and there is only one of them in the 6500 chassis....otherwise I would do ECLB.


Re: IDSM-2 "redundancy" in a single chassis

I meant that I have used this method with stand alone switches and appliance sensors, but it should be applicable to IDSMs and a 6500 chassis.

CreatePlease login to create content