10-04-2007 07:17 AM - edited 03-10-2019 03:49 AM
After the most recent sig tune (S303) I'm see a fair amount of activity from sig 3337.
Anyone else?
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-04-2007 07:26 AM
We've identified a false positive for signature 3337-0 in S303. As a work around for signature 3337-0 apply the following tuning to the signature:
specify-operation: yes
operation: 0
At present we are building S304 which addresses this issue.
View solution in original post
07-16-2008 11:13 AM
Can you divulge the circumstances of the false positive?
07-16-2008 11:14 AM
Can you divulge the cirumstances of this false positive?
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:
