Regarding above signature, I already checking on my exchange server (2003 with SP2) and confirmed we are patching with MS05-021 (KB894549) but there is still huge alarm fire between my exchange servers on this signature daily.
Any1 experienced this before? Mind to sharing your advice? thanks and appreciate it.
We just turned the signature off. I'm not in an environment where complicated filtering is feasible. There are exceptions, but if a false-postive alarm is cluttering up my display, it's gone. It helps that we're patched for this vuln.
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...