I'm looking for some sort of definitive answer to a dilema I am facing, which is whether the csalog generated on UNIX boxes by syslogd is actually needed for audit purposes or should the log files kept on the CSAMC be deemed authotitative?
I have some Unix SA's that are rotating the /var/adm/csalog files based on the syslog.conf file and they are changing the permissions of the csalog file which of course is triggering alerts.
Are these files redundant? Can I definitively say that any log file information I would need to satisfy an audit requirement could be found on the CSA MC?
Table of ContentsIntroductionVersion HistoryPossible Future
UpdatesDocuments PurposeNAT Operation in ASA 8.3+ SectionsRule Types
Network Object NATTwice NAT / Manual NATRule Types used per SectionNAT
Types used with Twice NAT / Manual NAT and Network Obje...
Table of Contents Introduction:This document describes details on how
NAT-T works. Background: ESP encrypts all critical information,
encapsulating the entire inner TCP/UDP datagram within an ESP header.
ESP is an IP protocol in the same sense that TCP an...