01-25-2012 09:08 AM - edited 03-16-2019 09:12 AM
We have several CUCM clusters in our environment and I was comparing the output of the license calculator. I found that some of the clusters seem to be counting what I am assuming are VG224 and FXS ports under the “Analog Phone” licensee and some aren’t. Does anyone have any detail about what kind of things show as devices under the Analog phone type?
Thanks for the help.
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-25-2012 09:40 AM
That is the reason, though you are obligated to purchase Analog UWL licenses for either protocol, CUCM is not there yet and does not track it properly for MGCP, H323, SIP defined ports.
HTH,
Chris
01-25-2012 09:22 AM
ATAs , VG2XX, FXS Ports..
Regards
01-25-2012 09:24 AM
that's what I thought however I have a cluster that has several VG224's configured on it and the Analog Phone line is showing 0
01-25-2012 09:26 AM
Are they configured as SCCP with all ports defined?
Are the clusters the same version?
Chris
01-25-2012 09:33 AM
I am comparing 2 clusters both running 8.5.1.12009-1. The cluster that is showing 0 Analog phones it looks like the VG224's are all registered as MGCP where the other cluster has some registered as SCCP. Interesting.
01-25-2012 09:40 AM
That is the reason, though you are obligated to purchase Analog UWL licenses for either protocol, CUCM is not there yet and does not track it properly for MGCP, H323, SIP defined ports.
HTH,
Chris
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide