07-26-2013 05:49 AM - edited 03-16-2019 06:34 PM
Hey team,
I have a MGCP trunk working properly.
All features are working, but the call back is working in the direction Cisco for Siemens only.
For example: If I make a call from a Cisco IP phone for analog phone via MGCP and I press call back , it´s fine! But, Siemens > Cisco I have a busy ton.
thanks.
07-26-2013 06:26 AM
What does the debugs saya about the disconnect cause???
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
07-26-2013 06:31 AM
Hey Jaime,
I will get the debug file in a few minutes...
07-26-2013 07:13 AM
Debug log is below, but I don´t know If analog central is sending a request to call back.
3065 is analog phone.
10:40:32.845 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12789^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:32.885 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:34.907 |MGCPpn9d::processPriSetup - viprCgpnE164=[3065], viprCdpnE164=[4800], vcrUploadNeeded=[t]|1,100,160,1.274^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:34.907 |DbMobility: can't find remdest 3065 in map|*^*^*
10:40:34.907 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:34.907 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:34.908 |!!ERROR!! -ConnectionManager- wait_AuDisconnectRequest :CI NOT FOUND IN TABLE,CI(29334280,0),discType=1,IFCreated(0,0),PID(0-0,0-0),IFHandling(0,0),MCNode(0,0)|1,100,160,1.274^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:34.908 |MatrixControl:updatePartyMediaCoordinatorNodeId: party1 videoCapable=0, party 2 videocapable=0|1,100,160,1.274^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:34.913 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12790^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:34.989 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12791^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:34.989 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:38.412 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12792^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:53.388 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:>|1,100,159,1.12793^*^*
10:41:02.722 |MGCPpn9d::processPriSetup - viprCgpnE164=[3065], viprCdpnE164=[4800], vcrUploadNeeded=[t]|1,100,160,1.276^10.13.1.151^*
10:41:02.722 |SdiStats: #Lines: 18 Free HWM: 6 Free HWM(total): 25|*^*^*
10:41:02.722 |DbMobility: can't find remdest 3065 in map|*^*^*
10:41:02.722 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:41:02.722 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:41:02.725 |!!ERROR!! -ConnectionManager- wait_AuDisconnectRequest :CI NOT FOUND IN TABLE,CI(29334282,0),discType=1,IFCreated(0,0),PID(0-0,0-0),IFHandling(0,0),MCNode(0,0)|1,100,160,1.276^10.13.1.151^*
10:41:02.725 |MatrixControl:updatePartyMediaCoordinatorNodeId: party1 videoCapable=0, party 2 videocapable=0|1,100,160,1.276^10.13.1.151^*
10:41:02.730 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12794^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:41:02.848 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12795^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:15.744 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12786^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:15.984 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:18.840 |MGCPpn9d::processPriSetup - viprCgpnE164=[3065], viprCdpnE164=[4802], vcrUploadNeeded=[t]|1,100,160,1.271^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:18.840 |DbMobility: can't find remdest 3065 in map|*^*^*
10:40:18.840 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:18.840 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:18.848 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12787^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:18.850 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12788^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
07-26-2013 06:29 AM
Jean,
You might need to check the integration document between your siemens and cucm. I know that in some integration, call back is not fully supported
Please rate all useful posts
"opportunity is a haughty goddess who waste no time with those who are unprepared"
07-26-2013 07:20 AM
Hey,
I have checked the integration document, but I my problem is the same.
thanks.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: