07-26-2013 05:49 AM - edited 03-16-2019 06:34 PM
Hey team,
I have a MGCP trunk working properly.
All features are working, but the call back is working in the direction Cisco for Siemens only.
For example: If I make a call from a Cisco IP phone for analog phone via MGCP and I press call back , it´s fine! But, Siemens > Cisco I have a busy ton.
thanks.
07-26-2013 06:26 AM
What does the debugs saya about the disconnect cause???
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
07-26-2013 06:31 AM
Hey Jaime,
I will get the debug file in a few minutes...
07-26-2013 07:13 AM
Debug log is below, but I don´t know If analog central is sending a request to call back.
3065 is analog phone.
10:40:32.845 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12789^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:32.885 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:34.907 |MGCPpn9d::processPriSetup - viprCgpnE164=[3065], viprCdpnE164=[4800], vcrUploadNeeded=[t]|1,100,160,1.274^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:34.907 |DbMobility: can't find remdest 3065 in map|*^*^*
10:40:34.907 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:34.907 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:34.908 |!!ERROR!! -ConnectionManager- wait_AuDisconnectRequest :CI NOT FOUND IN TABLE,CI(29334280,0),discType=1,IFCreated(0,0),PID(0-0,0-0),IFHandling(0,0),MCNode(0,0)|1,100,160,1.274^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:34.908 |MatrixControl:updatePartyMediaCoordinatorNodeId: party1 videoCapable=0, party 2 videocapable=0|1,100,160,1.274^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:34.913 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12790^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:34.989 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12791^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:34.989 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:38.412 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12792^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:53.388 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:>|1,100,159,1.12793^*^*
10:41:02.722 |MGCPpn9d::processPriSetup - viprCgpnE164=[3065], viprCdpnE164=[4800], vcrUploadNeeded=[t]|1,100,160,1.276^10.13.1.151^*
10:41:02.722 |SdiStats: #Lines: 18 Free HWM: 6 Free HWM(total): 25|*^*^*
10:41:02.722 |DbMobility: can't find remdest 3065 in map|*^*^*
10:41:02.722 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:41:02.722 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:41:02.725 |!!ERROR!! -ConnectionManager- wait_AuDisconnectRequest :CI NOT FOUND IN TABLE,CI(29334282,0),discType=1,IFCreated(0,0),PID(0-0,0-0),IFHandling(0,0),MCNode(0,0)|1,100,160,1.276^10.13.1.151^*
10:41:02.725 |MatrixControl:updatePartyMediaCoordinatorNodeId: party1 videoCapable=0, party 2 videocapable=0|1,100,160,1.276^10.13.1.151^*
10:41:02.730 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12794^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:41:02.848 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12795^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:15.744 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12786^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:15.984 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:18.840 |MGCPpn9d::processPriSetup - viprCgpnE164=[3065], viprCdpnE164=[4802], vcrUploadNeeded=[t]|1,100,160,1.271^10.13.1.151^*
10:40:18.840 |DbMobility: can't find remdest 3065 in map|*^*^*
10:40:18.840 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:18.840 |SPROC analyzeMsgtransCause MessageTransCause.ms = 0, MessageTransCause.ieid = 0, PriTsp.protocol = 29, MCStatus = 0|*^*^*
10:40:18.848 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12787^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
10:40:18.850 |<:MGCPENDPOINT><:S0>|1,100,159,1.12788^*^S0/SU0/DS1-0@em01vg01
07-26-2013 06:29 AM
Jean,
You might need to check the integration document between your siemens and cucm. I know that in some integration, call back is not fully supported
Please rate all useful posts
"opportunity is a haughty goddess who waste no time with those who are unprepared"
07-26-2013 07:20 AM
Hey,
I have checked the integration document, but I my problem is the same.
thanks.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide